Skip to main content

Table 3 Variables independently associated with interprofessional collaboration (IPC): Multiple linear regressions

From: Variables associated with interprofessional collaboration: a comparison between primary healthcare and specialized mental health teams

Linear regression models

Standardized Coefficients Beta

t

Sig.

95.0% Confidence Interval for B

Collinearity Statistics

LB

UB

Tolerance

VIF

MH Primary Care Teams (PCTs)a

Total sample (N = 101)

(Constant)

 

−1.584

.116

−7.259

.814

  

 Interactional Characteristics

Knowledge sharing score

.238

3.463

.0001

.395

1.457

.767

1.303

Knowledge integration score

.375

4.547

< .001

.796

2.030

.536

1.866

Team climate score

.265

3.119

.002

.119

.537

.504

1.984

 Professional Role Characteristics

Multifocal identification score

.141

1.975

.005

−.001

.419

.710

1.408

MH Specialized Service Teams (SSTs)b

Total sample (N = 214)

(Constant)

 

1.776

.077

−.341

6.536

  

 Individual Characteristics

Age (Mean/SD)

−.114

−2.450

.015

−.074

−.008

.973

1.028

 Interactional Characteristics

Knowledge integration score

.240

3.819

<.001

.376

1.179

.535

1.871

Mutual trust score

.124

1.852

.065

−.025

.795

.469

2.131

Team climate score

.323

3.828

<.001

.169

.528

.297

3.371

Team autonomy score

.084

1.699

.091

−.042

.567

.868

1.152

 Structural Characteristics

Organizational Support score

.106

1.931

.005

−.007

.709

.704

1.420

 Professional Role Characteristics

Multifocal identification score

.094

1.689

.005

−.023

.293

.682

1.467

  1. MH Primary Care Teamsa: Adjusted R2: 0,636; Goodness of fit–F: 44.696 P < 0.001
  2. MH Specialized Service Teamsb: Adjusted R2: 0.550; Goodness of fit–F: 38.159 P < 0.001