Skip to main content

Table 2 GP fidelity to the recommended matched treatment options

From: Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

Matched GP treatment options

Low risk

(n = 161, 38%)

Med risk

(n = 224, 52%)

High risk

(n = 45, 10%)

Grand Total

Advice - verbal

102

63%

108

48%

23

51%

233

Advice - written

91

57%

140

63%

17

38%

248

Advice – over-the-counter medication

84

52%

10

4%

  

94

Advise GP follow-up if symptoms persist

66

41%

12

5%

  

78

Refer to Physiotherapy

2

2%

85

84%

14

14%

101

Refer to MSK interface clinic

  

38

17%

10

22%

48

Refer to pain clinic (multi-disciplinary)

  

1

0%

3

7%

4

Personalised exercise programme

  

5

2%

1

2%

6

Refer to Occupational Health support

  

15

7%

3

7%

18

GP address comorbidity, distress or frailty

1

1%

7

3%

7

16%

15

Prescribe atypical analgesia

2

1%

59

26%

9

20%

70

Prescribe opioids

  

1

0%

10

22%

11

Signpost to peer support group

    

2

4%

2

Signpost/refer to lifestyle interventions

    

2

4%

2

Refer for surgical opinion

3

2%

4

2%

7

16%

14

Corticosteroid injection

1

1%

  

4

9%

5

Refer to rheumatology

  

2

1%

1

2%

3

Fidelity to stratified care in decision-making

Pt count

%

  

Low risk - per protocol

130

81%

  

Medium risk - per protocol

200

89%

  

High risk - per protocol

39

87%

  

Low risk - given Medium treatments

3

2%

  

Low risk - given High treatments

3

2%

  

Medium risk – given Low treatments

0

0%

  

Medium risk - given High treatment

5

2%

  

High risk – given Low treatments only

3

7%

  

High risk – given Medium treatments

0

0%

  

Low risk – only tool used (no treatments selected)

25

16%

  

Med risk – only tool used (no treatments selected)

19

8%

  

High risk – only tool used (no treatments selected)

3

7%

  

Grand Total

430