Theory (Key references) | Key concepts | Role in Development (Validation / Articulation / Design / Transformation) |
---|---|---|
Empowerment [46], Self-management [47], self-efficacy [48], person centred consultation [49, 50], counselling [51] | Set of theoretical approaches to changing the aims and approaches to diabetes management and the consultation in diabetes and wider. | Design: Provided the ‘positive’ case for change; there are things that could work better. Articulated the core conditions for care planning in practice. |
Learning is best if grounded in the person’s experience, built up from where people start; supports active learning, recognises importance of building self-efficacy. | Design: Informed the consultation model and all training and train the trainers modules. | |
Chronic care model (CCM) [21] | The 6 components required to work together in the community to enable ‘the engaged empowered patient and the organised proactive system to work in partnership’. | Validation and articulation: Components of CSP and The House. |
Identifies 3 components for successful implementation as • Quality of ‘evidence’ • Context for delivery • Method of facilitation | Design: Key theoretical driver for YOCP team before and during CSP | |
Importance of: • Being explicit about purpose • Reframing the practitioner role from supporting individual to ‘manage condition well’ towards ‘managing life with your condition’ | Articulation and validation: Better articulation of purpose of CSP and the language to debate tensions around roles and goal setting with practitioners. | |
Implementation as work within a social context. Core domains involved in collaboratively implementing complex interventions in complex environments. | Transformation: Mapping YOCP success criteria against NPT constructs. Reframing facilitation model, new training exercises, use of NPT tools, redesign NOMAD [60] tool for YOCP. | |
Recognising the value of ‘practical wisdom’ to translate core elements of an innovation into a local context to achieve spread. | Validation, Articulation and Transformation: Reframing the facilitation challenge as: ‘holding the flame’ vs ‘local tailoring [63] |