Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of the self-efficacy questionnaire

From: An educational study to investigate the efficacy of three training methods for infiltration techniques on self-efficacy and skills of trainees in general practice

 

median

minimal-maximal value

pre

post

3 months post

pre

post

3 months post

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

G1

G2

G3

knowledge-level

 gleno-humeral

3

2

3

4

4

5

4

4

4

0–4

0–4

0–4

3–5

3–5

3–5

2–4

3–5

2–5

 sub-acromial

3

3

2

4

4

4

4

4

4

1–5

0–4

0–4

3–5

3–5

3–5

2–5

2–5

2–5

 lateral epic.

2.5

2

2

5

4

4

4

4

4

1–5

0–3

0–3

3–5

4–5

3–5

2–5

2–5

2–5

 carpal tunnel

2

3

3

4

4

4

4

4

4

0–5

0–5

0–4

3–5

4–5

3–5

1–5

3–5

3–5

 knee

3

3

3

4

4

5

4

3

4

1–5

0–4

1–4

3–5

3–5

3–5

3–5

2–5

3–5

motivation

 gleno-humeral

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

4.5

3–5

1–5

4–5

4–5

3–5

4–5

3–5

4–5

2–5

 sub-acromial

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4.5

3–5

1–5

4–5

3–5

3–5

4–5

4–5

4–5

3–5

 lateral epic.

4

4

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

0–5

3–5

0–5

2–5

3–5

1–5

2–5

2–5

1–5

 carpal tunnel

4.5

4

5

5

4

5

4

4

5

2–5

2–5

4–5

3–5

3–5

3–5

2–5

2–5

3–5

 knee

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

2–5

1–5

3–5

3–5

2–5

4–5

4–5

3–5

4–5

skills

 gleno-humeral

2

1

1

4

4

4

3

3

3.5

0–4

0–3

0–4

3–4

3–5

3–5

2–5

1–5

2–5

 sub-acromial

2

2

1

4

4

4

4

3

4

0–5

0–4

0–3

3–5

3–5

3–5

2–5

1–5

2–5

 lateral epic.

1

1

1

4

4

4

4

4

4

0–4

0–3

0–4

3–5

2–5

1–5

2–5

1–5

2–5

 carpal tunnel

1

2

1

3

4

4

3

3

4

0–5

0–4

0–4

2–5

1–5

3–5

0–4

1–5

2–5

 knee

2.5

1

2

4

3

4

4

3

4

0–4

0–3

0–4

2–5

1–5

4–5

2–5

1–4

3–5

  1. Results are given as median and minimal – maximal value
  2. 0 = strongly disagree, 1 = disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = somewhat agree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
  3. pre = value before training, post = value immediately after training, 3 months post = value 3 months after training
  4. G1 group 1: only theoretical lecture, G2 group 2: theoretical lecture + anatomic models, G3 group 3: theoretic lecture + cadavers
  5. Scores in bold: scores post training are significantly higher than before training (p ≤ 0,05)
  6. Scores in italic: score (carpal tunnel)(G2) is significantly higher than after theoretical lecture (G1) (p ≤ 0,05)
  7. Scores with a full underline: Scores (knee)(G1 & G3) are significantly higher than after lecture + training on anatomical models (G2) (p ≤ 0,05)
Back to article page

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us