Skip to main content

Table 4 Intervention Practice responses (N = 27) to statements in end-of study questionnaire

From: Safety in primary care (SAP-C): a randomised, controlled feasibility study in two different healthcare systems

  Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Strongly agree
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Feedback on the safety climate survey was useful for improving patient safety. 1 (3.7%) 2 (7.4%) 1 (3.7%) 15 (55.6%) 8 (29.6%)
Completing the survey helped me reflect on how we manage patient safety in this practice. 1 (3.7%) 1 (3.7%) 16 (59.3%) 9 (33.3%)
Feedback from the trigger tool chart audit was useful for improving patient safety. 1 (3.7%) 6 (22.2%) 12 (44.4%) 8 (29.6%)
Changes were made at this practice based upon the information obtained from this intervention. 1 (3.7%) 6 (22.2%) 5 (18.5%) 10 (37%) 5 (18.5%)
Overall, I believe that this intervention had a positive effect on patient safety at this practice. 2 (7.4%) 3 (11.1%) 4 (14.8%) 11 (40.7%) 7 (25.9%)
The effect of this intervention is worth evaluating as a randomised controlled trial. 2 (7.4%) 5 (18.5%) 13 (48.1%) 7 (25.9%)