Skip to main content

Table 4 Intervention Practice responses (N = 27) to statements in end-of study questionnaire

From: Safety in primary care (SAP-C): a randomised, controlled feasibility study in two different healthcare systems

 

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

Agree

Strongly agree

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

N (%)

Feedback on the safety climate survey was useful for improving patient safety.

1 (3.7%)

2 (7.4%)

1 (3.7%)

15 (55.6%)

8 (29.6%)

Completing the survey helped me reflect on how we manage patient safety in this practice.

1 (3.7%)

1 (3.7%)

16 (59.3%)

9 (33.3%)

Feedback from the trigger tool chart audit was useful for improving patient safety.

1 (3.7%)

6 (22.2%)

12 (44.4%)

8 (29.6%)

Changes were made at this practice based upon the information obtained from this intervention.

1 (3.7%)

6 (22.2%)

5 (18.5%)

10 (37%)

5 (18.5%)

Overall, I believe that this intervention had a positive effect on patient safety at this practice.

2 (7.4%)

3 (11.1%)

4 (14.8%)

11 (40.7%)

7 (25.9%)

The effect of this intervention is worth evaluating as a randomised controlled trial.

2 (7.4%)

5 (18.5%)

13 (48.1%)

7 (25.9%)