Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment using EPHPP tool

From: Does patient self-management education of primary care professionals improve patient outcomes: a systematic review

Component

Becker et al. [30]

Rubak et al. [31]

Selection Bias 1. Are the individuals selected to participate likely to be representative of the target populations?

Can’t tell = 4

Can’t tell = 4

Selection Bias 2. What percentage of the selected individuals agreed to participate?

Less than 60% agreement = 3

Can’t tell = 5

SELECTION BIAS RATING

WEAK

WEAK

Study design

Randomized control trial = 1

Randomized control trial = 1

Was the study described as randomized?

Yes

Yes

Was the method of randomization described?

Yes

Yes

Was the randomization process appropriate?

Yes

Yes

Study design rating

Strong

Strong

Were there important differences between groups prior to the intervention?

No = 2

No = 2

What percentage of relevant confounders were controlled?

N/A

N/A

Confounders rating

Strong

Strong

Were the outcome assessors aware of the intervention status of participants?

Can’t tell = 3

Can’t tell = 3

Were the participants aware of the research question?

No = 2

No = 2

Blinding rating

Moderate

Moderate

Were data collection tools shown to be valid?

Yes = 1

Yes = 1

Were data collections tools shown to be reliable?

Yes = 1

Yes = 1

Data collection rating

Strong

Strong

Were withdrawals and drop-outs reported in terms of numbers/reasons?

Yes = 1

Yes = 1

Percentage of participants completing the study

80 = − 100% = 1

80 = −100% = 1

Withdrawals and drop outs rating

Strong

Strong

Intervention Integrity:

What percentage of participants received the allocated intervention?

80 = −100% = 1

80 = − 100% = 1

Was the consistency of the intervention measured

Can’t tell = 3

Can’t tell = 3

Is it likely that subjects received an unintended intervention that may influence results?

No = 5

No = 5

Analyses: Unit of allocation

Practice

Practice

Unit of analysis

Individual

Individual

Are the statistical methods appropriate for the study design?

Yes = 1

Yes = 1

Is the analysis performed by intervention allocation status (ITT) rather than actual intervention received?

Yes = 1

Yes = 1