Development of an evidence-based brief ‘talking’ intervention for non-responders to bowel screening for use in primary care: stakeholder interviews

Table 2 Characteristics of interviewed non-responders

Pseudonym	Sex	Region	Country	SIMD/IMD decile^a	Regular GP attendance
Sarah	female	Greater Glasgow & Clyde	Scotland	10^b	No
Bill	male	Lothian	Scotland	8	No
Andrew	male	Lothian	Scotland	8	No
Fred	male	Lothian	Scotland	not available	No
Maureen	female	Lothian	Scotland	6	No
Elsie	female	Lothian	Scotland	9	No
Joyce	female	Lanarkshire	Scotland	3	Yes, regular bloods
Sandra	female	Lanarkshire	Scotland	4	No
William	male	Lothian	Scotland	3	Yes
Angela	female	Lothian	Scotland	7	No
Flora	female	Lanarkshire	Scotland	2	No
Gregor	male	Lanarkshire	Scotland	9	Yes
Gavin	male	Greater Glasgow & Clyde	Scotland	10	Yes
Gillian	female	Tayside	Scotland	5	No
Alan	male	Midlands and North West	England	not available	Unknown
Clark	male	Midlands and North West	England	not available	“Used to”
Catherine	female	Midlands and North West	England	1	Yes
Dean	male	Midlands and North West	England	7	Yes
Graham	male	Midlands and North West	England	7	No

^aSIMD, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation; IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation. SIMD (http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Statistics/SIMD/SIMDPostcodeLookup/ScotlandPostcodeLookup) and IMD (http://imd-by-postcode.opendatacommunities.org/ found using postcode search. SIMD refers to the year 2012, while the IMD refers to 2015. Recent or very old postcodes did not retrieve SIMD details in three cases (hence the missing data). Deciles were used instead of quintiles as the latter were not available for England
^b1 = most deprived; 10-least deprived

ISSN: 2731-4553