Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariable analysis of factors influencing patient dissatisfaction with the diagnostic pathway of Parkinson’s disease

From: The diagnostic pathway of Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional survey study of factors influencing patient dissatisfaction

Variable

Patient dissatisfaction n (%)

Patient satisfaction/neutral n (%)

P value

Sex (n = 902)

<0.01*

 Male

74 (13.5%)

476 (86.5%)

 

 Female

74 (21.0%)

278 (79.9%)

Level of education (n = 902)

0.22

 Low

49 (19.6%)

201 (80.4%)

 

 Medium

40 (14.1%)

244 (85.9%)

 High

59 (16.0%)

309 (84.0%)

Duration of the diagnostic pathway (n = 902)

<0.001*

 Unknown

54 (13.3%)

352 (86.7%)

 

 < 2 years

28 (12.1%)

204 (87.9%)

 ≥ 2 years

66 (25.0%)

198 (75.0%)

Communication with the general practitioner (n = 77)

<0.001*

 Negative

40 (69.0%)

18 (31.0%)

 

 Neutral/positive

2 (10.5%)

17 (89.5%)

Communication with the neurologist (n = 78)

<0.01*

 Negative

41 (62.1%)

25 (37.9%)

 

 Neutral/positive

1 (8.3%)

11 (91.7%)

Number of healthcare providers involved (n = 902)a

<0.001*

 0

43 (8.2%)

484 (91.8%)

 

 1

52 (21.3%)

192 (78.7%)

 2

31 (34.8%)

58 (65.2%)

 ≥ 3

22 (52.4%)

20 (47.6%)

Second opinion (n = 856)b

<0.001*

 No/not mentioned

93 (12.5%)

650 (87.5%)

 

 Yes, on the patient’s initiative

29 (45.3%)

35 (54.7%)

 Yes, on the healthcare provider’s initiative

12 (24.5%)

37 (75.5%)

Experienced delay (n = 902)

<0.001*

 No delay

15 (3.2%)

454 (96.8%)

 

 Not (clearly) mentioned

9 (6.8%)

124 (93.2%)

 Yes, caused by the patient

2 (2.6%)

74 (97.4%)

 Yes, caused by a healthcare provider

111 (61.0%)

71 (39.0%)

 Yes, unknown who caused it

11 (26.2%)

31 (73.8%)

  1. *Statistically significant, P < 0.05
  2. aExcluding GP and neurologist
  3. bExcluding second opinion, initiative unknown