Skip to main content

Table 6 The CME-M impact on patients’ primary care interval (PCI)

From: Impact of a continuing medical education meeting on the use and timing of urgent cancer referrals among general practitioners - a before-after study

 

Reference group

N = 199 practices

CME-M group

N = 139 practices

Comparison between groups

 

Before

CME-M

After

CME-M

Before vs. after

Before

CME-M

After

CME-M

Before vs. after

   
   

OR0a (95% CI)

P

  

OR1a (95% CI)

P

OR1/OR0a (95% CI)

P

All data, N patients

1,227

753

-

 

990

1,102

-

 

-

 

PCI, median days (percentiles: 75th, 90th)

1 (13, 43)

1 (12, 46)

-

 

1 (14, 42)

1 (17, 53)

-

 

-

 

PCI ≥ baseline 75th percentilec %

25.8

24.4

0.812 (0.63;1.04)

0.099

25.1

27.9

1.19b (0.95;1.49)

0.135b

1.47 b (1.06;2.03)

0.021

PCI ≥ baseline 90th percentilec %

10.1

10.6

1.12b (0.79;1.57)

0.532

10.4

12.5

1.27b (0.92;1.74)

0.146

1.13b (0.72;1.78)

0.583

Easier to detect, N patients

887

515

-

 

685

774

-

 

-

 

PCI, median days (percentiles: 75th, 90th)

0 (8, 34)

0 (7, 35)

-

 

0 (7, 35)

0 (9, 41)

-

 

-

 

PCI ≥ baseline 75th percentilec %

26.2

23.9

0.87 (0.66;1.15)

0.345

27.2

29.7

1.18 (0.92;1.52)

0.187

1.35 (0.94;1.94)

0.101

PCI ≥ baseline 90th percentilec %

10.5

10.1

0.97 (0.66;1.44)

0.888

10.2

11.9

1.24 (0.87;1.77)

0.241

1.27 (0.76;2.12)

0.353

Hard to detect, N patients

284

191

-

 

261

274

-

 

-

 

PCI, median days (percentiles: 75th, 90th)

7 (26.5, 71)

5 (28, 79)

-

 

7 (27, 58)

8 (30, 80)

-

 

-

 

PCI ≥ baseline 75th percentilec %

25.0

25.7

1.12 (0.69;1.79)

0.653

25.7

30.3

1.35 (0.87;2.08)

0.180

1.21 (0.66;2.21)

0.543

PCI ≥ baseline 90th percentilec %

10.2

11.5

1.20 (0.62;2.34)

0.584

10.3

13.1

1.34 (0.73;2.46)

0.348

1.11 (0.48;2.59)

0.805

  1. Primary care intervals were measured as median, 75th and 90th percentile and the proportion of patients who had the longest primary care interval before and after the CME-M. The analyses are also stratified on cancer detection difficulty. Practices are divided into CME-M group and reference group. An effect within a group is shown as an odds ratio (OR0: Reference group; OR1: CME-M group). Comparisons between groups are shown as a ratio of odds ratios
  2. The suspected cancer types were divided into two groups based on cancer detection difficulty: 1) easier to detect included suspected cancer in kidney, bladder, breast, head and neck, female genitalia, nevus (melanoma), penis, testis and gastrointestinal and 2) harder to detect included suspected cancer in pancreas, liver and gall bladder, brain, lymph node and bone marrow, lung, prostate, connective tissue including fat, muscle and bones, and non-specific serious symptoms
  3. Abbreviations: PCI primary care interval, CME-M continuing medical education meeting, OR Odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  4. aAdjusted for cluster, practice type, patient gender, age and comorbidity
  5. bIn addition, adjusted for cancer detection difficulty
  6. c75th and 90th percentiles of baseline measurements (before the CME-M) were used for each group as basis
  7. Bold = significance level of p ≤ 0.05