Skip to main content

Table 5 The CME-M impact on patients’ prior contacts with general practice

From: Impact of a continuing medical education meeting on the use and timing of urgent cancer referrals among general practitioners - a before-after study

 

Reference group

N = 240 practices

CME-M group

N = 144 practices

 

N patients

Before

CME-M

7,659

After

CME-M

7,731

Before vs. after

Before

CME-M

7,121

After

CME-M

7,417

Before vs. after

Comparison between groups

Prior contacts

  

IRR0a (95% CI)

P

  

IRR1a (95% CI)

P

IRR1/IRR0a (95% CI)

P

F2F contacts (mean)

 0–1 month

1.91

1.89

1.00 (0.98;1.02)

0.662

1.92

1.90

0.99 (0.97;1.01)

0.190

0.99 (0.96;1.02)

0.525

 0–3 months

3.24

3.20

1.00 (0.98;1.02)

0.868

3.23

3.22

1.00 (0.98;1.02)

0.950

1.00 (0.97;1.03)

0.872

 4–6 months

1.82

1.81

1.01 (0.98;1.05)

0.536

1.84

1.83

0.99 (0.96;1.03)

0.870

0.99 (0.94;1.04)

0.583

Total contacts (mean)

 0–1 month

2.84

2.87

1.01 (0.99;1.03)

0.189

2.95

2.87

0.98 (0.94;0.99)

0.044

0.97 (0.94;0.99)

0.019

 0–3 months

5.17

5.21

1.01 (0.99;1.03)

0.233

5.31

5.19

0.99 (0.97;1.02)

0.369

0.98 (0.95;1.01)

0.137

 4–6 months

3.22

3.24

1.00b (0.97;1.04)

0.980

3.27

3.21

0.97b (0.94; 1.01)

0.138

0.97b (0.93;1.02)

0.296

Most contacting patients in the month preceding referral

 

OR0a (95% CI)

P

  

OR1a (95% CI)

P

OR1/OR0a (95% CI)

P

F2F contacts ≥ 4c (%)

10.4

10.4

1.02 (0.92;1.14)

0.726

10.8

10.8

0.99 (0.89;1.11)

0.911

0.97 (0.84;1.14)

0.745

Total contacts ≥ 5c (%)

16.9

17.2

1.04 (0.95;1.13)

0.426

18.5

17.5

0.94 (0.86;1.02)

0.148

0.90 (0.86;1.02)

0.112

  1. Prior contacts are shown as face-to-face and total contacts for three time periods: 0–1, 0–3 and 4–6 months and as the proportions of patients who had most contacts within the last month before referral. Practices are divided into CME-M group and reference group. The effect within a group is shown as an incidence rate ratio (IRR0: Reference group; IRR1: CME-M group), and comparisons between groups are shown as a ratio of incidence rate ratios. The effect on the proportion of the most attending patients within a group is shown as an odds ratio (OR0: Reference group; OR1: CME-M group), and comparisons between groups are shown as a ratio of odds ratios
  2. Abbreviations: CME-M continuing medical education meeting, F2F face-to-face, IRR incidence rate ratio, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  3. Face-to-face (F2F) contacts include contacts with GP and patient in same room. Total contacts include face-to-face contacts, e-mails and phone contacts
  4. aAdjusted for cluster, practice type, patient’s age, gender and habitual contact rate, Charlson Comorbidity Index
  5. bAdjusted for cluster, patient age and gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index
  6. c90th centile based on all data for F2F contacts and for total contacts
  7. Bold = significance level of p ≤ 0.05