Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinicians’ identified top 10 solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care

From: Clinician-identified problems and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study

Rank

Suggestions for solutions to delayed diagnosis in primary care

Total priority score

Type of interventions to decrease delayed diagnosis

Breakdown points in the diagnostic process

1

To have more rigorous systems in place for communicating abnormal results to patients

92.3

Structured-process change

Follow-up

2

Direct hotlines to specialists to discuss patient problems

91.4

Structured-process change

Referral & consultation

3

Clear referral guidelines and pathways for other common conditions (not just cancer)

88.4

Structured-process change

Referral & consultation

4

Improve handovers

86.9

Structured-process change

Referral & consultation

6

To have “affordable” GP update courses

86.3

Educational intervention

Patient-practitioner encounter

5

Better training of GPs in spotting warning signs of serious conditions, diagnosis that are easily missed and safety netting

86.3

Educational intervention

Patient-practitioner encounter

7

Review of every delayed diagnosis to learn how, why and whether it could be prevented in the future

85.4

Additional review & education

NA

8

Better ways of informing patients that their results are ready and what the next best steps would be

84.8

Structured-process change

Follow-up

9

Training in decision making and reinforcing the concept on ongoing reflection to continuous consideration of differential diagnosis

84.5

Educational intervention

Patient-practitioner encounter

10

Have easier access to secondary care for the patients that GPs are worried about

83.9

Structured-process change

Referral & consultation

  1. (Clinicians scored solutions using the following criteria: feasibility, cost-effectiveness and potential for saving lives (Table 1). The scoring options were 1 for “yes (e.g. this solution is feasible)”, 0 for “no (e.g. this solution is unfeasible)”, 0.5 for “unsure (e.g. I am unsure if this solution is feasible)” and blank for “unaware (e.g. I do not know if this solution is feasible)”. Total Priority score is the mean of the scores for each of the three criteria and is ranging from 0 to 100. Higher ranked solutions received more “Yes” responses for each of the criteria and a higher score)