Outcome | RMC A | RMC B | RMC C | RMC D | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overarching aim: | Better use of resources | ✓ (A1, A2, A3) | ? (B1, B3) - Too soon to draw conclusions | ? (C2) - Too soon to draw conclusions | ✓ (D1, D3) ✘ (D1, D2, D3)- Commissioner not convinced by figures |
Desired outcomes: | Improved quality of patient care | ✓ (A1, A3, A5) - Patients generally unaware ✘ (A2, A5) - Occasional restricted choice for patients - Concern about quality of community service provision | ✓ (B2, B5) - Community clinics offer convenience and shorter waiting times ✘ (B2, B3, B4, B6) - Reduced patient choice - Referrals sometimes get lost | ✓ (C1, C2) - Quicker referral times - More time and information available to support patient choice | ✓ (D1, D3) - Patients unaware - RMC highlights cases that should be upgraded to urgent |
Reduced referrals to secondary care | ✓ (A1, A2, A4) - Up to 15 % reduction | ✓ (B4) - 8 % reduction | ? (C2) - Not a significant impact but too soon to tell | ✓ (D1, D3) ✘ (D2) - Commissioner not convinced by figures | |
Improved efficiency of referral process | ✓ (A2, A3, A4, A5) ✘ (A1, A2, A5) - Some duplication of work due to administrative glitches - Teething trouble with IT/systems | ✓ (B3, B6) ✘ (B1, B2, B3, B4) - Some issues with under-capacity and turnaround times - Some duplication of work | ✓ (C1, C2, C3, C4) ✘ (C1, C3, C4) - Some issues with under-capacity and turnaround times - Issues with booking management system | N/a | |
Intermediate outcomes: | Improved referral quality | ✓ (A2, A3) | ? (B1, B4) - Believed to be reducing variability in referrals | ? (C1) - Anecdotally, fewer rejections from providers | ✓ (D1, D3) |
Diversion of referrals to alternative services | ✓ (A2, A4) | ✓ (B3, B5) | ✓ (C3) | N/a | |
Reduced burden on GPs and practice staff | ✓ (A4, A5) | ✓ (B3) | ✓ (C1, C2, C3, C4) | N/a | |
Process implementation: | Standardised referral processes | ✓ (A2, A3) | Not mentioned in data | ✓ (C1, C2) | N/a |
GP education/culture change | ✓ (A1, A3) | ✓ (B2, B4, B5, B6) | ✓ (C1, C2, C3, C4) | ✓ (D1, D2, D3) | |
Implementing primary care pathways | ✓ (A2) | ✓ (B1) | ✓ (C2) | ✘ (D2) - Did not effect pathway change as expected | |
Centralising referral/booking processes | Not mentioned in data | ✓ (B4, B6) | ✓ (C1, C2) | N/a | |
Providing up-to-date service knowledge | ✓ (A1, A2, A4) | ✓ (B1, B3) | ✓ (C1, C2) | ✓ (D3) | |
Informing service development | Not mentioned in data | ✓ (B2, B4, B5, B6) | ✓ (C1) ✘ (C2) - Some concerns regarding data quality | Not mentioned in data | |
Data: | Collection and analysis of data | ✓ (A2) | ✓ (B2, B3, B4) | ✓ (C3, C4) | ✓ (D2, D3) |