Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of the selected studies

From: General practice based psychosocial interventions for supporting carers of people with dementia or stroke: a systematic review

 

Reference

Quality Item [28]

Burns et al., [29]

Nichols et al., [30]

Fortinsky et al., [31]

Rodriguez-Sanchez et al., [32]

1

Question / objective sufficiently described?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

2

Study design evident and appropriate?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

3

Method of subject/comparison group selection or source of information/input variables described and appropriate?

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

4

Subject (and comparison group, if applicable) characteristics sufficiently described?

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

5

If interventional and random allocation was possible, was it described?

Yes

N/A

N/A

Yes

6

If interventional and blinding of investigators was possible, was it reported?

Yes

Partial

N/A

No

7

If interventional and blinding of subjects was possible, was it reported?

Partial

No

N/A

No

8

Outcome and (if applicable) exposure measure(s) well defined and robust to measurement / misclassification bias? Means of assessment reported?

Yes

Partial

No

Yes

9

Sample size appropriate?

Yes

Yes

Partial

Yes

10

Analytic methods described/justified and appropriate?

Yes

Partial

Partial

Yes

11

Some estimate of variance is reported for the main results?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

12

Controlled for confounding?

Partial

Yes

No

Yes

13

Results reported in sufficient detail?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

14

Conclusions supported by the results?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Overall quality score

93%

58%

81%

86%

  1. N/A not applicable