An interactive workshop plus locally adapted guidelines can improve General Practitioners asthma management and knowledge: A cluster randomised trial in the Australian setting

Table 3 Pre and Post intervention GP asthma knowledge in the intervention and control groups.

	Pre intervention		Post Intervention
Group	N*	Mean(SD)	N	Mean(SD)	Diff (95% CI)		P
Knowledge about asthma – Percentage correct responses out of 21 statements
Group 1	18	63.5(12.3)	16	80.8(13.1)	0
Group 2	17	62.8(12.4)	15	71.1(11.6)	-10.7	(-21.9, 0.56)	0.06
Group 3	15	61.8(10.1)	9	70.2(14.5)	-7.6	(-19.6, 4.4)	0.20
Assessment of severity of acute attack in children – Percentage of correct responses out of 11 statements
Group 1	18	30.9(11.9)	16	56.3(17.9)	0
Group 2	17	35.6(13.1)	15	40.1(17.3)	-14.1	(-28.1, -0.01)	0.05
Group 3	14	33.1(13.3)	9	33.8(13.3)	-20.9	(-35.7, -6.2)	0.01
Identification of a child with asthma that may be at high risk – Percentage of correct response out of 10 statements
Group 1	18	82.8(8.3)	17	89.4(9.0)	0
Group 2	17	84.7(10.7)	15	89.3(9.6)	-0.02	(-6.9, 6.8)	1.00
Group 3	15	81.3(8.3)	9	82.2(8.3)	-7.2	(-14.5, 0.17)	0.06

Diff = Difference between means, adjusted for outcome at baseline; Reference group is Group 1
n = Number of GPs
SD = Standard deviation
95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval. Linear regression was fitted on the mean score for each practice.
Nb. One GP in Group 2 did not have baseline information (excluded from the total)
Group 1 = Asthma Education + guidelines
Group 2 = Guidelines only
Group 3 = Alternative (ear, nose and throat) education only

ISSN: 2731-4553