From: Striking variations in consultation rates with general practice reveal family influence
 | Step 1: health status of family members | Step 2: health status of family members + circumstances | Step 3: health status of family members + circumstances + socialisation conditions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Odds ratio | Confidence interval | Odds ratio | Confidence interval | Odds Ratio | Confidence interval |
Health status | ||||||
Chronic disease in the family (no = ref) | 0.13** | 0.06–0.30 | 0.13** | 0.04–0.27 | 0.14** | 0.05–0.38 |
Family score self-reported health (higher score = more members reported bad health) | 0.19** | 0.08–0.46 | 0.30* | 0.12–0.87 | 0.38 | 0.14–1.03 |
Family circumstances | ||||||
Private insurance (social = reference) |  |  | 2.63* | 1.07–6.42 | 3.01* | 1.11–8.13 |
Number of children |  |  | 2.40** | 1.59–3.64 | 2.47** | 1.57–3.88 |
Indicators for socialisation | ||||||
Father or mother paid employment in health care sector (not = ref) |  |  |  |  | 2.40 | 0.82–7.01 |
Both parents western cultural background (one or both non-western = ref) |  |  |  |  | 0.37 | 0.07–2.11 |
Sum score Nijmegen expectation Questionnaire1 |  |  |  |  | 1.14* | 1.04–1.24 |
Self-care in minor ailments |  |  |  |  | 0.54 | 0.19–1.54 |
Not much trust in GPs (much = ref) |  |  |  |  | 0.23 | 0.04–1.22 |
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.51 | |||
Percentage correct | 87.9 | 87.9 | 89.5 |