Skip to main content

Table 3 Use of CAM and conventional treatments by socio-demographiccharacteristics and severity of pain.

From: The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain

 

n

CAM treatment use n (%)

Conventional treatment use n (%)

Combined use n (%)

  

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

All participants

138

116 (84)

22 (16)

111 (80)

27 (20)

95 (69)

43 (31)

Age groups

       

18–59

39

37 (95)

2 (5)

32 (82)

7 (18)

31 (79)

8 (21)

60–69

51

44 (86)

7 (12)

42 (82)

9 (18)

36 (71)

15 (29)

70+

48

35 (73)

13 (27)

37 (77)

11 (23)

28 (58)

20 (42)

  

p = 0.005*

p = 0.544

p = 0.033

Gender

       

Male

55

43 (78)

12 (22)

33 (60)

22 (40)

30 (55)

25 (45)

Female

83

73 (88)

10 (12)

78 (94)

5 (6)

65 (78)

18 (22)

  

p = 0.125

p < 0.001

p = 0.003

Socio-economic class

       

Professional or managerial

68

52 (76)

16 (24)

50 (74)

18 (26)

42 (62)

26 (38)

Intermediate

29

29 (100)

0 (0)

26 (90)

3 (10)

24 (83)

5 (17)

Routine or manual

41

35 (85)

6 (15)

35 (85)

6 (15)

29 (71)

12 (29)

  

p = 0.014

p = 0.119

p = 0.118

CPG

       

I

37

28 (76)

9 (24)

25 (68)

12 (32)

21 (57)

16 (43)

II

46

40 (87)

6 (13)

37 (80)

9 (20)

32 (70)

14 (30)

III

32

29 (91)

3 (9)

28 (88)

4 (12)

25 (78)

7 (22)

IV

23

19 (83)

4 (17)

21 (91)

2 (9)

16 (70)

7 (30)

  

p = 0.310

p = 0.013

p = 0.156

  1. P-values were derived by chi square test (test for linear trend in the case of age group and CPG)