Tanner's stages
|
Cutoff point for BMI values
|
Sensitivity
|
Specificity
|
Odds ratio
|
---|
|
> 85th
|
< 85th.
| | | |
---|
Tanner III
| | | | | |
Males
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 34)
|
31
|
3
| |
91.2%
| |
NLP (n = 77)
|
41
|
36
|
46.7%
| | |
Total (n = 111)
|
72
|
39
| | |
9.1
|
Females
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 36)
|
31
|
5
| |
86.1%
| |
NLP (n = 66)
|
34
|
32
|
48.5%
| | |
Total (n = 102)
|
65
|
37
| | |
5.9
|
Tanner IV
| | | | | |
Males
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 48)
|
43
|
5
| |
89.6%
| |
NLP (n = 59)
|
31
|
28
|
47.5%
| | |
Total (n = 107)
|
64
|
33
| | |
7.8
|
Females
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 43)
|
39
|
4
| |
87.5%
| |
NLP (n = 46)
|
18
|
28
|
83%
| | |
Total (n = 89)
|
47
|
32
| | |
15.2
|
Tanner V
| | | | | |
Males
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 54)
|
48
|
6
| |
88.8%
| |
NLP (n = 55)
|
23
|
32
|
58.2 %
| | |
Total (n = 109)
|
71
|
38
| | |
11.1
|
Females
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 50)
|
45
|
5
| |
84.8%
| |
NLP (n = 51)
|
22
|
28
|
66.2%
| | |
Total (n = 101)
|
68
|
33
| | |
11.5
|
Adults
| | | | | |
Males
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 65)
|
59
|
6
| |
86.4%
| |
NLP (n = 67)
|
29
|
38
|
67.0%
| | |
Total (n = 132)
|
88
|
44
| | |
12.9
|
Females
| | | | | |
ILP(n = 60)
|
54
|
6
| |
85%
| |
NLP (n = 62)
|
28
|
34
|
65.8%
| | |
Total (n = 122)
|
82
|
40
| | |
10.9
|
- Normal lipid profile values were those < 75th percentile for age and sex, moderate risk > 75th percentile and < 90th percentile, and high risk ≥ 90th percentile. For comparison between adolescent and adults percentiles were used. ILP was determined as being ≥ 85th percentile adjusted for age and sex. Normal blood cholesterol level in adults = TC < 200 mg/dl (5.2 mmol/L), moderate risk as 5.2 to 6.2 mmol/L and high risk if > 6.2 mmol/l (240 mg/dl). For LDL cholesterol; normal if < 3.4 mmol/L (130 mg/dl), moderate risk as 3.4 to 4.1 mmol/L and high risk if > 4.1 mmol/L (159 mg/dl). HDL cholesterol was defined at high risk if < 0.9 mmol/L (35 mg/dl). TRG levels was normal if < 2.8 mmol/l (250 mg/dl), moderate risk as 250–500 mg/dl and high risk if > 5.6 mmol/L (500 mg/dl). [38]