Table 3 General practitioners’ level of agreement about statements concerning outcome expectancy, content, and validity of comparative performance information
From: Comparative performance information plays no role in the referral behaviour of GPs
Statements | Totally agree/disagree | Do not know |
|---|---|---|
Mean (s.d.) | % | |
CPI is not transparent about how information is determined | 3.6 (0.7) | 18 |
CPI is not clear because of contradictory sources | 3.6 (0.7) | 20 |
CPI is not credible | 3.2 (0.7) | 20 |
CPI is not in line with patients’ wishes | 3.2 (0.6) | 27 |
CPI is difficult for patients to understand | 3.3 (0.7) | 21 |
CPI is not specific enough | 3.3 (0.7) | 21 |
CPI is not user friendly | 3.3 (0.7) | 23 |
CPI gives the wrong choice attributes | 3.2 (0.6) | 20 |
CPI is not up to date | 3.1 (0.6) | 28 |
CPI has no ability to show differences in quality of care | 3.0 (0.6) | 20 |