Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect estimates for the comparisons concerning referral to local resources with follow-up

From: Interventions aimed at increasing the level of physical activity by including organised follow-up: a systematic review of effect

Study

Outcome

Participants (studies)

Comparison

Effect measure

Follow-up period/s

Effect estimate

Quality of the documentation

Elley [19]

Energy expenditure kcal/kg/week

878 (1)

Advice

Mean change diff (96% CI)

9 months

9.38 (3.96, 14.81)

Low1,5

Fortier [20]

Minutes of moderate PA/day

120 (1)

Advice

Mean diff, p-value

Post-treatment

−1.8, ns

Low3

  

120 (1)

  

3 months

−1.6, ns

Low3

 

PA score

120 (1)

 

Mean diff, p-value

Post-treatment

5.5, p = 0.01

Moderate1

  

120 (1)

  

3 months

0.9, ns

Low3

Harrison [21]

Number of participants who met PA goal (90 min/week)

330 (1)

Advice

OR (95% CI)

3 months

1.67 (1.08, 2.60)

Moderate1

  

312 (1)

  

9 months

1.49 (0.86, 2.57)

Low3

Stevens [22]

Level of PA last 4 weeks

314 (1)

Advice

Mean diff (95% CI)

4 months

1.52 (1.14,1.95)

Low1,4

Armit [23]

Number of participants who met PA goal (150 min/week)

91 (1)

Advice

OR (95% CI)

Post-treatment

2.07 (0.86, 5.02)

Low3

  

91 (1)

  

3 months

1.14 (0.47, 2.76)

Low3

Taylor [24]

Minutes of PA/week

67 (1)

No treatment

Mean diff, p-value

1 month

66, ns

Very low2,6

  

67 (1)

  

3 months

- 23, ns

Very low2,6

  

67 (1)

  

6 months

- 4, ns

Very low2,6

 

Energy expenditure kcal/kg/day

67 (1)

 

Mean diff, p-value

1 month

0.7, ns

Very low2,6

  

67 (1)

  

3 months

0.1, ns

Very low2,6

  

67 (1)

  

6 months

0.2, ns

Very low2,6

  1. Legend: PA = physical activity, ns = not significant; 1only one study, 2only one small study, 3only one study an wide confidence interval, 4unclear risk of bias at study level, 5unclear risk of bias at study level + only 35% got the intervention, 6 unclear risk of bias at study level + incomplete data.