Patient factors considered by GP
|
- patients who don’t understand the numbers (‘blank look on face’)
|
- bring up numbers if patient is higher risk or risk not well controlled/ managed
|
- numbers assumed to be less helpful for less educated/literate patients
|
- patients who are interested in the science/evidence (males, highly educated)
|
- patients who will get stuck in a long discussion of the numbers rather than focusing on what they can do
|
- use numbers to justify treatment/no treatment for borderline patients
|
|
- withhold absolute risk from highly anxious and low risk patients
|
- gamblers more familiar with probability
|
Descriptions of risk
|
- risk level: low/negative risk, medium/moderate risk, high/severe/positive/increased risk
|
- absolute risk % (probability of a heart attack or stroke in the next 5 or 10 years)
|
- multiple risk factors: coexisting, mounting up, exponential
|
- convert absolute risk % into a frequency (e.g. 1 in 8 people like you)
|
- scenarios: future cardiac event, being ill for a prolonged period, explain in terms of patient’s life (e.g. family member who had CVD event)
|
- change in absolute risk % if risk factors reduced
|
- analogies: compare to other risks
|
- relative risk for particular populations (diabetics, high risk ethnicity)
|
| |
- compare individual risk factor results to guideline targets
|
Communication tools
|
- position on colour-coded absolute risk chart (red = high risk, green = low risk)
|
- absolute risk calculator to show current/future risk and effect of risk factors
|
|
- images (e.g. cholesterol spikes, what the brain looks like during a stroke, coronary artery to show relationship between high cholesterol and heart attack)
|