Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistically Significant Predictors for Reaching Target Blood Pressure

From: Hypertension and type 2 diabetes: What family physicians can do to improve control of blood pressure - an observational study

 

OR (95% CL)

VARIABLE

BP at Target

(< 130/80 mmHg)

Systolic BP at Target

(< 130 mmHg)

Diastolic BP at Target

(< 80 mmHg)

INDIVIDUAL LEVEL-1 PATIENT FACTORS

Predisposing characteristics

   

AGE

   

   < 55 years

 

---------------

---------------

   55-64 years

 

0.93 (0.54-1.60)

1.87 (0.88-3.89)

   65-74 years

 

0.62 (0.32-1.18)

3.56 (1.67-7.56)*

   75 + years

 

0.48 (0.25-0.96)*

6.12 (2.66-14.12)*

GENDER

   

   Male

  

---------------

   Female

  

2.09 (1.03-4.25)*

Evaluated Need

   

YEARS SINCE HYPERTENSION DIAGNOSIS

   

   In the past 5 years

---------------

  

   5 to 10 years ago

1.62 (1.07-2.44)*

  

   Over 10 years ago

1.04 (0.67-1.60)

  

   I do not remember

1.12 (0.25-4.96)

  

LIPIDS: LDL-CHOL

   

   Uncontrolled

  

---------------

   Controlled

  

1.68 (1.14-2.49)*

RENAL STATUS

   

   Missing

0.52 (0.28-1.01)

0.45 (0.23-0.87)*

 

   Normal

---------------

---------------

 

   Microalbuminuria

1.10 (0.70-1.72)

1.28 (0.79-2.07)

 

Overt Nephropathy

0.48 (0.33-0.69)*

0.48 (0.31-0.76)*

 

Personal Health Practices

   

MEDICATION ADHERENCE

   

   High Adherence

---------------

---------------

 

   Medium Adherence

0.72 (0.50-1.04)

0.80 (0.54-1.19)

 

   Low Adherence

0.29 (0.09-0.86)*

0.34 (0.12-0.96)*

 

   Missing

1.65 (0.79-3.43)

1.87 (0.92-3.82)

 

BLOOD PRESSURE SELF-MONITORING

   

   No

---------------

---------------

 

   Sometimes

0.87 (0.58-1.30)

0.79 (0.53-1.18)

 

   Often

0.51 (0.33-0.79)*

0.47 (0.28-0.80)*

 

EAT FOODS LOW IN SALT

   

   No

---------------

 

---------------

   Yes

1.74 (1.25-2.41)*

 

2.35 (1.49-3.70)*

NO CONTEXTUAL PHYSICIAN OR SYSTEM LEVEL-2 FACTORS WERE SIGNIFICANT IN THE HLM MODEL

  1. NOTE: Only variables found to be statistically significant in the final hierarchical models are included.
  2. * Statistically significant