Skip to main content

Table 2 Appropriate decisions in regard to 6 process indicators

From: Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain

 

CHD

No CHD

 

Women (n = 88)

Men (n = 92)

p-value

Women (n = 608)

Men (n = 450)

p-value

GP assumes CHD - n (%)

59 (67.0)

64 (69.6)

0.72

67 (11.0)

53 (11.8)

0.71

Exercise test - n (%)

3 (3.4)

7 (7.6)

0.22

26 (4.3)

33 (7.3)

0.03

Referral cardiologist - n (%)

24 (27.3)

19 (20.7)

0.30

53 (8.7)

47 (10.4)

0.34

Exercise test or referral cardiologist - n (%)

27 (30.7)

26 (28.3)

0.72

79 (13.0)

80 (17.8)

0.03

 

Indication for urgent hospital admission

No Indication for urgent hospital admission

 

Women (n = 37)

Men (n = 33)

p-value

Women (n = 505)

Men (n = 663)

p-value

GP assumes ACS - n (%)

14 (42.4)

14 (37.8)

0.70

6 (0.9)

10 (2.0)

0.12

Hospital admission - n (%)

12 (36.4)

18 (48.6)

0.30

8 (1.2)

18 (3.6)

< 0.01

  1. The horizontal part of the table lists our 6 process indicators reflecting diagnostic assumptions and decisions taken by GPs. The vertical columns show the decision of the reference panel in regard to CHD stratified by gender.